Singing and scones. First, singing. I just listened to Chanticleer singing "O Come, O Come Immanuel" on the radio. It was ethereal and transcendent. Yet again I wished I had a great singing voice. To be able to open your mouth and produce a sweet, piercing sound that makes people's eyes well up would be to me a truly magical power. Like beauty, a great voice is something you either have or you don't. No amount of hard work will ever produce golden tones.
I remember a girl I knew in college; she lived on my floor in my freshman dorm. I don't even remember her name now. But I remember her voice. A group of us would sit around on the floor late at nights, smoke cigarettes, and sing folk songs, and her voice rose above the others like pure silver. I so much wanted to be able to do what she did so effortlessly, but it was not to be. The only singing I've ever done is to my kids when they were small, and I even put an end to that when my then-two-year old daughter looked up at me pleadingly and said, "Mommy, don't sing." Everyone's a critic.
*******************************************************************************
I have a perfect Christmas memory. (Actually, I have many, but here's one.) I once lived in Canada where there was a village untouched by commercialism and the tourist onslaught that later devoured it. There was a main street that ran along a canal, with a bridge at one end and an old mill with a waterwheel at the other. The buildings were all made of stone, weathered by centuries of northern winters. In them were shops that sold wooden toys imported from Scandanavia or handmade candles and wooly mitts or beer from anywhere in the world. There was a tea shop, run by two Scottish grannies, that was a welcome refuge from the cold, the leaden skies, and an afternoon of shopping. The wood floor creaked comfortingly, a fireplace crackled with warmth and light, and tea was served in giant pots engulfed in tea cozies. The scones came with clotted cream and strawberry jam, homemade of course.
The tea shop was not a twee imitation concocted by marketers but a plain and simple place where everything seemed about a hundred years old, the leaded windows still held the wavy glass of earlier times, and the Scottish accents of the ladies whose domain this was took you quite out of yourself. They understand comfort in the British Isles. Sitting in that tea shop all those years ago, with a good friend and our two babies, drinking endless cups of tea while the babies dozed in their strollers and we ordered another round of scones--it WAS Christmas--I couldn't imagine that anything in my life would ever go wrong.
Friday, December 3, 2010
What the Hell?
What the hell are the Republicans trying to do? And why are the American people letting them get away with it? To take just one issue--the extension of unemployment benefits--the Republicans say we can't afford it. We have to cut spending (more like slash and burn) AND taxes, as if starving government programs would somehow solve our financial problems. What "cutting spending" means is this: families with disabled children (picture a ten-year old who can only eat through a tube, can't speak, can't walk, can't bathe herself) will lose desperately-needed services; more families will be driven to the wall by ballooning medical costs; more people who seek employment will feel like failures because there are no jobs in sight; and the economy will still be in the toilet.
Over and over, I hear economists--famous, reputable ones--say, let government keep people afloat and create jobs in the short term, and plan on reducing the deficit in the long-term. The Republican drumbeat is that raising taxes discourages job-creation, that government is the problem and can't be trusted. What amazes me is how so many Americans fail to recognize that the government is us. Everyone in Congress is there because enough Americans wanted them to be there. Our government is not an occupying army. If Congress refuses to extend unemployment benefits, what that says to me is that America is a selfish country, at least half of whose people (the majority of voters in our last election) lack the compassion to imagine what it feels like to be poor or to be caught up in circumstances beyond one's control.
There are two ways to go. As a people, we can band together to create a compassionate, fair, tolerant society and make decisions based on those values, or we can make money the measure of all things. I love that challenge to create a hypothetical society without knowing where you would fit into it. What if you were plunked down in a society as a gay person or a woman or a disabled person? Would the society you "created" be as good for you as for everyone else? The society we have now is very good for rich people. Money rules. I am flabbergasted that people who stand to lose the most were the very ones who elected a Congress that is intent on protecting the wealthy while slashing away at programs that benefit the majority of us.
Others have articulated my position far better than I--Paul Krugman and Robert Reich to name two--but I want to register my protest against the madness. Americans are angry. I am angry. I am especially angry at the wizards of Wall Street who led us into this ravine, but I am angry too at those who fail to realize that whoever started this mess, we are all going to have to help clean it up. Before we pull the rug out from under ordinary people, let's raise taxes to the levels of the Reagan or Clinton eras. An undertaxed society is a starved society. Too many of our citizens are going hungry, and we damn well better do something about it.
Over and over, I hear economists--famous, reputable ones--say, let government keep people afloat and create jobs in the short term, and plan on reducing the deficit in the long-term. The Republican drumbeat is that raising taxes discourages job-creation, that government is the problem and can't be trusted. What amazes me is how so many Americans fail to recognize that the government is us. Everyone in Congress is there because enough Americans wanted them to be there. Our government is not an occupying army. If Congress refuses to extend unemployment benefits, what that says to me is that America is a selfish country, at least half of whose people (the majority of voters in our last election) lack the compassion to imagine what it feels like to be poor or to be caught up in circumstances beyond one's control.
There are two ways to go. As a people, we can band together to create a compassionate, fair, tolerant society and make decisions based on those values, or we can make money the measure of all things. I love that challenge to create a hypothetical society without knowing where you would fit into it. What if you were plunked down in a society as a gay person or a woman or a disabled person? Would the society you "created" be as good for you as for everyone else? The society we have now is very good for rich people. Money rules. I am flabbergasted that people who stand to lose the most were the very ones who elected a Congress that is intent on protecting the wealthy while slashing away at programs that benefit the majority of us.
Others have articulated my position far better than I--Paul Krugman and Robert Reich to name two--but I want to register my protest against the madness. Americans are angry. I am angry. I am especially angry at the wizards of Wall Street who led us into this ravine, but I am angry too at those who fail to realize that whoever started this mess, we are all going to have to help clean it up. Before we pull the rug out from under ordinary people, let's raise taxes to the levels of the Reagan or Clinton eras. An undertaxed society is a starved society. Too many of our citizens are going hungry, and we damn well better do something about it.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Now I Get It
I think about my mother a lot. She has been gone for many years, but I feel I am still working out my relationship with her--trying to find the truth of it, as it were. Did I really "get" her? I was sure she didn't "get" me, but now that I am "of a certain age" I'm beginning to think she perhaps understood me better than I thought. I certainly hope so, because if she did there's a chance she might have forgiven me for all the difficulties I brought into her life.
Everyone gets a cold; it's one of the inconveniences of life. It hardly qualifies as a major life crisis, yet when you're in the throes of one, nothing is more important than how miserable you feel. So too, everyone gives their parents fits. One of the givens of family life is conflict, and that conflict is a two-way street, with both parents and their children providing their fair share. Out of this conflict comes guilt, the low-grade fever that blunts happiness. I assume everyone feels something like this, so what's the big deal? A cold, guilt--they're ubiquitous, so why dwell on them? I think often of Tolstoy's first line in Anna Karenina: "Happy families are all alike. Unhappy families are each unhappy in their own way." (Forgive the undoubtedly inexact quote.) Since I've taken up this blog to get things off my chest and to try to figure out my life, I'm taking license to indulge in self-examination and giving myself permission to be solipsistic, so, gentle reader, be warned. My feelings--well--feel unique to me. They are most interesting to me. If they are of interest to you, so much the better. The great thing about blogs is that they're not assigned reading (at least I don't think so).
I could cite chapter and verse of my growing up years, and maybe someday I'll lift the lid a bit on some of the more interesting passages (is that a mixed metaphor?) What concerns me here is the way I feel as if my shadow is gradually filling in the shadow laid down by my mother, the one I have lived beneath since I had memory. I remember her telling me that after she retired she had too much time to think. I had no idea what she meant, and I still don't know what passed through her mind. She never confided in me, so I can only guess what apparently troubled her. Now I am retired, and I think I'm beginning to understand a little of what she might have meant.
Here's what I hope: That my mother understood that my adult life was like spinning plates atop sticks. Remember those from the Ed Sullivan Show? (Only if you're a geezer like me.) So much energy and attention goes toward keeping the whole show on the road that it's hard for anything else to catch your attention, let alone hold it. I lived far from my parents and saw them on average twice a year for a week each time. That is nothing! Of course my mother had time to think; she had 50 weeks a year to do nothing else. So one of the things I feel guilty about is the distance I allowed to exist between me and my parents over decades. One of my horrors is being lonely in old age, and I am afraid my parents often were. How do you apologize to people who are no longer alive? And don't tell me they're in heaven where they see and know all. I wish that were true, I deeply wish it, but I know it isn't so.
Everyone gets a cold; it's one of the inconveniences of life. It hardly qualifies as a major life crisis, yet when you're in the throes of one, nothing is more important than how miserable you feel. So too, everyone gives their parents fits. One of the givens of family life is conflict, and that conflict is a two-way street, with both parents and their children providing their fair share. Out of this conflict comes guilt, the low-grade fever that blunts happiness. I assume everyone feels something like this, so what's the big deal? A cold, guilt--they're ubiquitous, so why dwell on them? I think often of Tolstoy's first line in Anna Karenina: "Happy families are all alike. Unhappy families are each unhappy in their own way." (Forgive the undoubtedly inexact quote.) Since I've taken up this blog to get things off my chest and to try to figure out my life, I'm taking license to indulge in self-examination and giving myself permission to be solipsistic, so, gentle reader, be warned. My feelings--well--feel unique to me. They are most interesting to me. If they are of interest to you, so much the better. The great thing about blogs is that they're not assigned reading (at least I don't think so).
I could cite chapter and verse of my growing up years, and maybe someday I'll lift the lid a bit on some of the more interesting passages (is that a mixed metaphor?) What concerns me here is the way I feel as if my shadow is gradually filling in the shadow laid down by my mother, the one I have lived beneath since I had memory. I remember her telling me that after she retired she had too much time to think. I had no idea what she meant, and I still don't know what passed through her mind. She never confided in me, so I can only guess what apparently troubled her. Now I am retired, and I think I'm beginning to understand a little of what she might have meant.
Here's what I hope: That my mother understood that my adult life was like spinning plates atop sticks. Remember those from the Ed Sullivan Show? (Only if you're a geezer like me.) So much energy and attention goes toward keeping the whole show on the road that it's hard for anything else to catch your attention, let alone hold it. I lived far from my parents and saw them on average twice a year for a week each time. That is nothing! Of course my mother had time to think; she had 50 weeks a year to do nothing else. So one of the things I feel guilty about is the distance I allowed to exist between me and my parents over decades. One of my horrors is being lonely in old age, and I am afraid my parents often were. How do you apologize to people who are no longer alive? And don't tell me they're in heaven where they see and know all. I wish that were true, I deeply wish it, but I know it isn't so.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Welcome to my blog
After much thought and with some trepidation, I have decided to write a blog, or at least to begin one. Whether I shall be the hero of my own blog remains to be seen (pace Dickens). When I was a teacher, I had an audience that I very much enjoyed. I relished the give-and-take of the classroom and the chance to speak my mind--to a degree. I tried, though, not to impose my own religious, political, or otherwise controversial views on my students. My job was to teach, not to indoctrinate. But now I am retired, I am getting older and ornerier, and I have opinions. Before it is too late, I would like to share some of them, partly in hopes of persuading others, but mostly, I suppose, simply to get things off my chest. Putting things into words has always been my outlet; in fact, nothing seems entirely real to me until I dress it in language. I believe in the power of the word, and despite the fact that I wish my own facility with words was far better than it is, I still want/need to speak my mind. If you don't like what I have to say, don't read my blog, but I intend to tell the truth as I see it--finally and at long last.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)